Responsive Ads Here

Friday, October 28, 2022

WAEC QUESTIONS ON UNEXPECTED JOY AT DAWN: THE BURIAL OF MASSA, THE EFFECT OF EXPULSION OF ‘ALIENS’ FROM NIGERIA ON NII, MAMA OROJO’S RELATIONSHIP WITH HER CHURCH MEMBERS IN AMEN KRISTI AND NII’S ENCOUNTER WITH I-PUT-IT-TO-ME

 




THE BURIAL OF MASSA IN THE NOVEL

The novel has its relation to the theme of adverse effects of failed leadership. The mismanagement of the affairs of government does not only lead to xenophobia but also causes severe economic hardship for the citizens. The character of Massa is identify as Nij Tackie’s wife. She is about 25years, but is already looking like a grandmother. She is terminally ill, but Nij knows no relative of hers. Nii is unable to take her to a proper hospital and on the way to a spiritualist, Massa dies. With Massa dead, and things being difficult, Nii decides to leave for Nigeria in search of his people. Simultaneously, Nii’s sister, Mama Orojo, embarks on a journey to Ghana in search of Nii. Mama arrives in Ghana after Nii has left for Nigeria.  Arriving in Ghana, Mama is introduced to Joe, the Daga boss, by a policeman. Joe and Mama do business and fall in love. Mama stumbles on the fact of Massa’s death during her enquiries about her brother, Nii, at Expense Bank.

Mama does not know that Nii has married; neither does she know her sister-in-law. Her sense of decency and fairness urges her to find the body of her brother’s late wife and bury it. She travels (with Joe) to the Koforidua Government Hospital mortuary for the corpse. She carries the corpse to Sampa for burial. Thus, Massa receives a fitting burial from her unknown sister-in-law.

 

THE EFFECT OF EXPULSION OF ‘ALIENS’ FROM NIGERIA ON NII IN THE NOVEL:

In relation to theme in the novel, events and the actions of the characters are founded on the theme of social dysfunction. Nii is not spared the consequences of these as he arrives in Nigeria at the height of an expulsion order. Nii Tackie’s character is identify as the protagonist.  He is a Nigerian born in Ghana. He has Yoruba tribal marks but bears a Ghana name and does not speak Yoruba. His sister lives in Nigeria; their parents are dead. He is an Assistant Manager of a bank in Accra. 

There is a military regime in Ghana. Assets and bank accounts have been frozen and the cost of living is high; life is unbearable. Nii's wife is very ill and dies on their way to a healing centre.  Nii dumps the body of his dead wife at the mortuary at Koforidua and sets out for Nigeria. Nii joins other travellers like him. He sees Aaron, an entrepreneur denied assistance by Nii’s bank is in the bandwagon. The travellers are harassed by the security forces.  Nii is cheated by a cominercia!l motorcyclist.  Nii's arrival in Nigeria coincides with an expulsion order. The deadline for aliens to leave is fast approaching. Nii is not recognized as a Nigerian. The fact that he has a sister at Ijase and the tribal marks on his face avail him nothing. No one listens to him and he has to be careful to avoid being arrested by the Immigration official. His new-found love dies and is buried hurriedly and secretly. The deportation order puts Nii at great risk and delays his reunion with his sister.


NII’S ENCOUNTER WITH I-PUT-IT-TO-ME IN THE NOVEL.


The theme of survival under circumstances of constraint is a major one in the novel: The curfew, imposed by soldiers at the helms of affairs, restricts nocturnal movement; yet one needs to get home at the close of the day. When the curfew catches up with both Nii and I-Put-it-to-me, they both use their heads.  Nii is the protagonist; his wife, Massa has been bedridden for some time now; he takes care of the sick woman without help. I-Put-it-to-me, also known as Tally O, is a crafty man; a member of a team of illegal miners, the Daga group; one other member is Joe, the man who marries Nii’s sister mama Orojo; he swiles Mama; he dies in the mines. It is curfew time and soldiers and vigilante are abroad. Nii has been visiting Linda, the secretary in his office who, wants an affair with him.  Nii leaves Linda and slips through the security of curfew, pretending to be a lunatic, to get home.  Nii notices a man sitting on the stump of a tree in front of his door; he passes by and enters the house. He relates his experiences to Massa. The man is I-Put-it-to-me; he is biding his time to beat the curfew. A soldier, ‘an army lance corporal’, enters Nii’s room with I-Put-it-to-me, who is being held for breaking curfew’. I-Put it-to-me insists that he is only looking after his sick sister.  Nii is asked to confirm whether  ‘you wanted to take your wife to the hospital but for the curfew’. Nii is confused; I-Put-it-to-me takes advantage and lies successfully to safety. Both Nii and I-Put-it-to-me avoid arrest for breaking curfew by ingenuity. Their meeting is ironical; it is this same I-Put-it-to-me who sells a fake gold ring to Nii’s sister on her flight to Ghana. Even though Nii knows nothing at all about the stranger, I-Put-it-to-me knows the details of Nii’s life. Nii and I-Put-it-to-me never meet again as the latter promises. 

MAMA OROJO’S RELATIONSHIP WITH HER CHURCH MEMBERS IN AMEN KRISTI: 


Mama’s cordial relationship with members of the church belies the theme of dysfunction in governance. The activities of Mama’s church are not interfered with by national politics and she is faithful to her church. Mama Orojo is Sister to Nii. She lives in Nigeria and comes to Ghana searching for her brother, Nii. She is a member of the Amen Kristi Church; occupies a key position in the church. The Amen Kristi is a religious sect at ljase. Mama’s relationship with the church is cordial. She is very close to the pastor, elders and members. That is why she goes to the chairman of the church together with the other elders in the hope that they will be happy when they hear her decision to marry.  Mama’ show of empathy on hearing the chairman’s report of the armed robber case in Ijase  brings out the best in her. She decries the challenges of the armed robbers. Her reaction of shaking her head reveals her feeling of bewilderment.  Mama’s show of approval (nodding) of the chairman after he renders the church’s record of expenditure indicates the special bonding between her and the church. Mama’s act of generosity on which the pastor always relies particularly the  financing of the church building which highlights the love between the church and her. Even though there arises opposition to her intended spouse, she does not react negatively though she resists firmly.

WAEC QUESTIONS: WHY LAKUNLE LOSES SIDI TO BAROKA AND THE THEME OF LOVE AND MARRIAGE IN THE LION AND THE JEWEL




WHY LAKUNLE LOSE SIDI TO BAROKA

The play is about conflict between tradition and modernity. Payment of bride price is strictly attached to traditional marriage. Lakunle refuses to pay the traditional bride price for Sidi, losing her to Baroka. 

 Lakunle is a ‘half-baked’ educated young village teacher who places western values above traditional customs, including the payment of bride price.  Sidi is the village beauty. She is simple, naive and has an overblown image of herself. She is the ‘jewel’ of liujinle. She represents African traditional values. Baroka is the traditional ruler of Ilujinle and is 62 years. He upholds customs and employs wit and cunning to lure Sidi to join his many wives. He is the Lion of Iujinle.  Sadiku is the oldest wife of Baroka whom he inherited from the late chief, Okiki. She is simple-minded and used by Baroka to find other women to be his wives. 

 Lakunle approach Sidi in the morning where he criticizes Sidi’s traditional background. He sees Sidi as ignorant, uneducated and uncultured. He condemns bride price as primitive and barbaric. However, he promises Sidi a good civilized life after marriage. 

Baroka  approach Sidi in the noon through Sadiku. Baroka sends Sadiku to Sidi with his proposal.  Sadiku promises Sidi wealth, honour and prestige if married to Baroka.  She praises Sidi's beauty, and invites her to supper with Baroka at the palace which Sidi refuses.

 Baroka wins Sidi’s love as he re-strategizes; he shares the secret of his impotence with Sadiku. Sadiku breaks the secret to Sidi. Sidi goes to mock Baroka at his palace.  Sidi is lured to bed , but discovered the shocking truth to her amazement; Baroka is not impotent.

 Sidi snobs Lakunle for Baroka after she  returns to the company of Lakunle and Sadiku in agony, devastated and speechless.  She later breaks the news that the ‘lion’ has broken her virginity.  Lakunle now promises to marry Sidi without the payment of bride price. Sidi disappears, but returns dressed and prepared for marriage to Baroka, to the chagrin of Lakunle. Lakunle relies on Western ideas and values; yet he is immature in the race for Sidi and loses her love and her hand in marriage.  Baroka employs traditional wit and skill (backed by deception) to win Sidi’s love in the end. 



THE THEME OF LOVE AND MARRIAGE IN THE PLAY

 The play is about conflict between tradition and modernity as manifested in courtship and marriage. Lakunle refuses to pay the traditional bride price for Sidi, losing her to Baroka.  Baroka is the Bale of Ilujinle. He epitomizes traditional love and marriage which is polygamous and based on the payment of bride price. Lakunle is a young half educated village school! teacher who places western values above traditional custom. Based on courtship and non-payment of the bride price as epitomized by Lakunle who is more of a caricature.  Lakunle represents love in the modern sense - non-payment of bride price and complete abandonment of tradition and customs related to love and marriage. Tradition represented by sidi and Baroka, will not accept anything less than the payment of the bride price. Lakunle's verbosity exposes his lack of firm foundation: "A savage custom, barbaric. outdated/rejected, denounced, accused excommunicated....’ Sidi describes Lakunle’s bombastic words as mere persuasion. Lakunle describes love and marriage as a savage custom, barbaric. outdated....excommunicated’. His attempts to kiss Sidi are rebuffed as untraditional, inspite of his entreatics. he does not succeed in winning Sidi over. 

 Regardless of Baroka’s seduction of Sidi through pretence of his impotence after being aided by sadiku, he marries her, according to custom,  Lakunle's failure to win Sidi proves that traditional love and marriage is based not on words but on compliance with the traditional requirements. The marriage between Baroka and Sidi symbolizes He continuation of the African social order which has been ‘threatened’ by the mockery of western values in the play.


THE MOOD OF THE PERSONA IN “THE GOOD MORROW" AND THE THEME OF REGRET IN “THE JOURNEY OF THE MAGI"




THE MOOD OF THE PERSONA IN “THE GOOD MORROW"

Two people in love with each other can create a world of their own in which nothing else that is outside it matters. Mood is about one’s mental/emotional disposition towards an object or a given situation. In the poem, mood conveys the excitement and certainty about the lovers’ new found love. 

The persona’s mood is one of excitement: “I wonder by my troth, what thou and I/Did, till we lov’d? This excitement is based on his realization that they had been acting childishly at first, or they had been merely sleeping for countless years. The rhetorical questions confirm the initial mood of excitement. The mood changes from excitement to certainty. He is sure that this new love is not subject to fear or distractions of the external world. The room they occupy is all the world to them. He and his loved one are in a perfectly harmonious relationship: “Where can we find two better hemispheres without a sharp north and a declining west? There is the feeling of great Confidence. The relationship is transparent and compatible and their new love is not subject to death; it’s immortal. “If our two loves be one, or thou and I/love so alike that none do slacken, none can die”. Thus excitement, certainty, assurance and confidence define the persona’s mood. 


THE THEME OF REGRET IN “THE JOURNEY OF THE MAGI"

The Poem deals with the search for spiritual fulfilment in the course of life’s journey. Three men are the magi who decide to embark on a journey for spiritual fulfilment. The three men face challenges in their search for the birth place. Their encounter with the birth confuses the Object of their mission. The travellers had ugly experiences in the course of the journey. It was along and tedious journey at worst time of the year “A cold ,.. worst time... sharp, deep winter”. The travellers' camels become Sore footed’ along the way. They meet with hostile, unfriendly cities where prices of items are exorbitant. They meet gamblers, women and others drinking liquor. Their ‘night fires” go cut. They see a ‘white horse and the temperate valley’. They continued amidst difficulties until they achieved their goal.  The Magi now wish for another life. 

There are Instances of Regret in the poem, the unfriendly weather and time of the journey are causes for regret. The experience of the Magi with gamblers, bad women and alcoholics makes them regret embarking on the journey and moore importantly, the loud “voices singing in our ears, saying/that this was all folly” heightened their regret. They wish that they hadn’t embarked on the journey in the first place. There are glimpses of hope, for example “The white horse” and “the temperate weather” they encounter later. 

 The Magi fulfill their objective, “finding the place; it was (you may say) satisfactory”. “There was a birth certainly ” They assess the birth “I have seen births and deaths...this birth was hard and bitter agony for us”. They return in doubt and regret. “We returned to our places, these kingdoms ‘but no longer at east here, in the old dispensation. The determination of the Magi to arrive at their destination is worthy of emulation.  Fulfilment of one’s desires far outweighs the challenges. Man will, no matter the regrettable experiences in life, continue for the quest for self-fulfilment. 


Waec Questions On Jimmy Porter In Look Back In Anger: Jimmy’s Views About The Victorian Society Of His Time, Jimmy 's Sense Of Alienation In The Play, Comparison Of Jimmy And Cliff As Friends And Alison’s Reactions To Jimmy’s Attacks On Her Family





JIMMY’S VIEWS ABOUT THE VICTORIAN SOCIETY OF HIS TIME IN THE PLAY

The theme deals with the conflict between the social classes in Victorian/English Society which is highlighted in the marriage between Jimmy and Alison. Jimmy is about 25 years old. He is married to Alison Redfem. The playwright describes him as ‘capable of cruelty and sincerity’.  He’s tall and slim and has few friends because of his ‘apparent honesty’. He is a university drop out.  His view of the structure of Victorian Society is that it is divided into working class and middle/upper class people and based on education and privilege. Jimmy drops out of the university after one year. He and his friend, Cliff, are decidedly working class, except that ( ‘some of his mother’s relatives are pretty posh’.  His wife, Alison and her parents are of a stable middle class family. Alison’s brother, Nigel is fairly well-to-do. Her father and mother are fairly well to do too. He sees that all is not well between the classes and he hates Alison’s parents, particularly her mother. for not wanting him to marry Alison. He does not like Alison’s friend, Helena, though they temporarily fall  in love and she leaves him to save her conscience. After he has married Alison in a rush, he and his friend Hugh Tanner, drag her along to gate-crash her parents’ middle class friends’ parties and cause a stir.  He finds working class life routine and monotonous because people are generally jobless. They accept any job like the sweets-stall to make ends meet, He and his friend, Cliff, pour over the weekend newspaper, aimlessly to kill boredom. Alison and Helena while away the time ironing. For him, love across-class marriages have built-in instability. His marriage to Alison is not conventional; it is unconventionally blessed in Church.  Alison’s parents attend the ceremony uninvited. The marriage itself remains stormy, Jimmy and Alison begin to make a few sacrifices for love e.g. when Alison returns to Jimmy after she moved out of the house. Alison's Parents’ marriage is, however, stable because it is founded on class, love and convention. Alison’s father, Colonel Redfern feels guilty about how he treats Jimmy. 




JIMMY PORTER’S SENSE OF ALIENATION IN THE PLAY:


 The play deals with the frustrating social life of post-World-War-II Britain and its negative effect on relationships Jimmy shows his frustration in his relation with his friend, Cliff and his wife, Alison as well as in what he does as a middle-class man. Jimmy Porter is the protagonist. He is tall and thin and about 25 years. He is married to Alison and smokes a pipe. He and Cliff are friends and  all three live together in a flat.  He is educated, unemployed but operates a sweets stall.  Often drinks tea, and blows his jazz trumpet to keep off boredom.
 Jimmy is highly educated. Jimmy's education has not been obtained through the old, respected institutions: “According to him, it’s not even red brick. but white tile’ (Alien-Act 2Sc.1) (iii) He finds himself out of job because he does not have the contacts which will get him a high placement He therefore feels estranged from the establishment and becomes increasingly frustrated and angry and lashes out on Cliff, his friend and Alison his wife at the least provocation. He marries Alison in an unconventional and private manner to defy her parents: preference. Right after marrying Alison , he takes her along and gate crashes parties of well known middle class families in an embarrassingly untidy or inappropriate clothing.  He nicknames Alison “Pusillanimous’.  feeling that Britain has lost its identity: Jimmy finds it difficult to achieve stability because, according to him, Britons are ‘living in the American age’. He and others like him are drifting: ‘Our youth is slipping away’.
 Jimmy’s responsibility for his own alienation can be attributed to his own haughty and self-righteous attitude to life.  His feeling of being wronged by society and wanting to pay back.  His earlier failed attempt to truly love Alison and Helena.  He is redeemed by Alison's sudden, return and their resuming lives as husband and wife (He is a squirrel and she is a bear). 



COMPARISON OF JIMMY AND CLIFF AS FRIENDS:


The play deals with the frustrating  social life of Post-World-Wai-ll Britain and its negative effects on relationships.  Jimmy shows his frustration in his relation With his fiend, Cliff and his wife. Alison. Jimmy and Clift’s friend is sustained by their contrasting attitudes to life. Jimmy Porter is the protagonist. He is tall and  thin and about 25 years. He is married to Alison and smokes a pipe. He and Cliff are friends live together.  Cliff Lewis is short. dark, and big boned and the same age as Jimmy, He lives with Jimmy and his Wife in the couple's attic bed-sitter and assists Jimmy in his business. (3) Both Jimmy and Cliff come from middle class background. Jimmy is a drop-out educated from the university but unemployed except that Jimmy operates a sweet Stall that is given to him by his friend, Hugh Tannet’s mother. Their relationship is marked by boredom in the flat they share as Cliff is often asked to make tea to kill off their boredom, on Sundays, they are both glued to newspapers and quarrelling over who is more educated about the ongoing news. 
There are Complications in their relationships and at the centre of the complication is Alison, Jimmy's wife, &  Cliff is opposed to Jimmy's ill-treatment of Alison and falls for her. Jimmy does not even care when Cliff and Alison are in a compromising situation.  Even when Cliff commends Alison, Jimmy does not appreciate. Jimmy can be vulgar and sometimes insults his friends as ignorant. 

Regardless of their amicable banter, Cliff is unhappy, Cliff suddenly decides to leave Jimmy to Alison when he is  of no use to the relationship. 


ALISON’S REACTIONS TO JIMMY’S ATTACKS ON HER FAMILY


The theme deals with the conflict between the social classes which is highlighted in the marriage between Jimmy and Alison.  Alison Porter is Jimmy Porter’s wife. She is the daughter of Colonel Redfem. She is from the upper class. Alison is described in the play as “elusive personality, tall, slim, dark”.  She is about the same age (25years) as Jimmy and Cliff.  She is a friend of Helena. She is Cliff’s best friend and confidant. 
Jimmy Porter is Alison’s husband. Jimmy is well educated and informed; a university dropout. He runs a sweet-stall together with Cliff. He is described as ‘tall, thin, young man of about 25 years of age’.  He is a ‘disconcerting mixture of Sincerity and cheerful malice, of tenderness and freebooting... cruelty’.  Jimmmy’s attacks on Alison and  her family when  Jimmy derisively asks Alison if she feels the papers make her not so brilliant. He often insults Alison for her inability to react to the problems of her social class.  He calls Alison ‘Lady Pusillanimous... wanting of firmness of mind, of small courage, having a little mind, mean cowardly, timid of mind...’ He disparages Alison’s brother, Nigel and calls him “the straight-backed, chinless monster who went to Sandhurst”. 
Jimmy condemns Nigel’s lifestyle. He says “He’s a big chap? ... The Platitude from outer space... Now, Nigel is just about as vague as you can get without being actually invisible”. Jimmy attacks Nigel and Alison, labelling them “Sycophantic, Phlegmatic and Pusillanimous”. Jimmy insults Alison's Mummy and Daddy, calling them “militant, arrogant and full of malice”. He condemns Alison’s father’s disposition to re-live the romantic past. 
Alison takes Jimmy attacks on his family “tirades calmly” without saying anything and ignoring him. She shows she is “used to these carefully rehearsed attacks’ and ‘carries on with her ironing’.  She deliberately attempts to divert attention to the other issues such as asking Cliff if he wants to smoke.  She takes Helena’s advice to leave Jimmy.
Alison's reactions demonstrate maturity and love. Her reactions highlight Jimmy's needless and misdirected anger against socio-economic problems in the society. It paves the Way for Allisson's return and  enables Jimmy to take Alison back and the two to enjoy their true love as bear and squirrel

ANALYSIS OF CAGED BIRD- MAYA ANGEOLU

  MAYA ANGEOLU - CAGED BIRD

 


Caged Bird

Maya Angelou 

A free bird leaps
on the back of the wind   
and floats downstream   
till the current ends
and dips his wing
in the orange sun rays
and dares to claim the sky.



But a bird that stalks
down his narrow cage
can seldom see through
his bars of rage
his wings are clipped and   
his feet are tied
so he opens his throat to sing.



The caged bird sings   
with a fearful trill   
of things unknown   
but longed for still   
and his tune is heard   
on the distant hill   
for the caged bird   
sings of freedom.

The free bird thinks of another breeze
and the trade winds soft through the sighing trees
and the fat worms waiting on a dawn bright lawn
and he names the sky his own

But a caged bird stands on the grave of dreams   
his shadow shouts on a nightmare scream   
his wings are clipped and his feet are tied   
so he opens his throat to sing.


The caged bird sings   
with a fearful trill   
of things unknown   
but longed for still   
and his tune is heard   
on the distant hill   
for the caged bird   
sings of freedom.

 

About the Poet

Writer and activist, Maya Angelou, had a broad and successful career as a streetcar conductor, dancer, editor, teacher storyteller and actress. Born Marguerite Johnson in 1982, she gained fame with I know Why the Caged Birds Sings, her 1970 autobiography which speaks courageous with racism. Angelou died in 2014 at the age of 86.

Maya Angelou


Background to the poem

Maya Angelou’s “Caged Bird” is highly romantic. Romantic poems present nature as embodiment of freedom and perfection. Angelou contrasts the struggles of a bird attempting to rise above the limitations of adverse surroundings with the flight of a bird that is free. She seeks to recreate in the reader sentiment toward the plight of the misused, captured creature, a symbol of downtrodden African Americans and their experiences. Angelou is indignant that American society refuses to imagine the powerful impact of traumatic assault on the psychological integrity of the Black society.  In the Angelou’s “caged bird”, Negritude and femininity make contradictory, irreconcilable demands on the poet-speaker’s sense of personal identity.  The colour of her skin, the kindness of her hair and the fullness of her lips all contributed to socially engendered feelings of physical inadequacy bordering on self hatred. The poet speaker perpetual struggle throughout “Caged Bird” is for acceptance, recognition, valorization, caring and love.

Summary

In the first stanza, the speaker describes a bird taking flight and gliding on a wind current. The bird revels in its freedom, feeling the warmth of sun rays on its wings as it flaps them. The speaker describes the free bird's flight as "dar[ing] to claim the sky."

The second stanza introduces a comparison of the free bird to a caged bird. Imprisoned, the caged bird stalks his cage and feels rage over having clipped wings and tied feet. The flight-limiting cage, wing clipping, and tied feet prompt the bird to sing.

In the third stanza, the speaker says the caged bird sings a song infused with a fear of the things the bird does not know but longs for nonetheless. The caged bird's tune reaches a distant hill because it is a song yearning for freedom.

Stanza four returns to the free bird, who contemplates the arrival of another strong wind and thinks about the fat worms which await him on lawns in the morning. He claims the sky as his own.

The fifth stanza shifts back to the caged bird, whose perch is "the grave of dreams" and whose "shadow shouts on a nightmare scream." Because his wings are clipped and his feet tied, he opens his throat to sing.

The sixth and final stanza is a word-for-word repeat of the third stanza. The caged bird sings a song that is fearful of the things the bird does not know but for which it longs. The speaker concludes the poem by repeating that the song reaches a distant hill because "the caged bird sings of freedom."

Through juxtaposing the symbolic experiences of two birds—one free and one caged—Maya Angelou explores themes of freedom, oppression, and resilience. The result is an allegory for the comparative experiences of white Americans who take their freedom and privilege for granted and Black Americans who face systemic racial and economic oppression, and yet because of this oppression, have a deeper and truer knowledge of what freedom is.

In terms of form, “Caged Bird” comprises six stanzas of free verse. The poem also uses an inconsistent rhyme scheme that combines occasional end rhymes, slant rhymes, and internal rhymes. Angelou establishes rhythm in the first line through the use of iambs, which creates a stress pattern of a short syllable followed by a long syllable: e.g. a FREE bird LEAPS.

However, as the poem is written in free verse, Angelou often breaks with the iambic rhythm to subvert the listener’s expectation of how the line will sound. For example, the third stanza begins with what would be four lines of iambic dimeter were it not for the introduction of a fifth syllable in the second line (“with a fearful trill”). The effect of breaking the rhythm—making it slightly off-balance—is that Angelou captures in her language the “fearful trill” being described.

Angelou also uses enjambment—the continuation of a clause or sentence over multiple lines—to enhance the images she describes. The first stanza, in which the free bird takes flight and drifts on the wind, is a single sentence extended over seven lines. The effect of Angelou’s lineation is to make the language itself seem to float along the same wind current on which the free bird glides. Interestingly, Angelou also uses enjambment in the second stanza, but puts the device to different effect: rather than enhancing a sense of freedom, enjambment in the second stanza emphasizes the caged bird’s claustrophobia and desperation.

Another device Angelou uses to great effect in “Caged Bird” is repetition in various forms. The omniscient speaker shifts between the perspectives of the free bird and the caged bird, a repetition that establishes the juxtaposition between the two birds’ experiences and invites the reader to compare them. Repetition also occurs on the line level: The last three lines of the second stanza (“his wings are clipped and / his feet are tied / so he opens his throat to sing”) repeat exactly as the last two lines of the fifth stanza.

More significantly, the third stanza is repeated word-for-word in the final stanza. With her repetition, Angelou draws the reader’s attention to the image of the bird singing his song of freedom. The effect is to underscore how the caged bird, because he lacks the variety freedom offers, continues to sing as his only recourse for expressing the longing his confinement engenders. In this way, the repetition highlights both the monotony of the bird’s existence and his sustained resilience in the face of that monotony.

“Caged Bird” also uses repetition in the sense that its premise is a repetition of the basic conceptual idea of Paul Laurence Dunbar’s 1899 poem “Sympathy,” in which the speaker sympathizes with a caged bird who beats its wings against its cage and sings. Angelou used the line “I know why the caged bird sings!” for the title of her 1969 autobiography, and returned to the premise of a poetic speaker sympathizing with a caged bird in “Caged Bird.” Angelou’s poem is in conversation with Dunbar’s symbolic verse about the bondage of slavery to suggest that even from her post-Civil Rights Movement vantage, the legacy of white supremacy in the United States continues to negatively impact the Black community.

Like Dunbar’s speaker, Angelou’s speaker sympathizes with the oppressed caged bird. Angelou’s speaker also attributes an attitude of entitlement and obliviousness to the free bird, who “dares to claim the sky” and “names the sky his own.” The free bird is akin to privileged white Americans who benefit from the inequality built into the foundation of U.S. governance and the U.S. economy. By contrast, the caged bird is akin to Black Americans who, despite being born into structures that limit their freedom and oppress them, sustain a spiritual resilience that transcends their material conditions.

Analysis of the Poem

 The poem begins by speaking of the free bird and how it has the freedom to go where ever, when ever, and can claim the sky because there are no other birds to contest with. The poet-speaker show us that the free bird is lazy and would rather float on the wind instead of making its own path. Here, the poet draws the attention of the readers to the description of the 'free bird' by using visual images such as 'leaps', 'floats', 'dips. A bird that is free interacts with nature and 'dares to claim the sky ' The speaker illustrates how the free bird, or white race is untroubled. It also shows how the white society has the audacity to own and govern the society unjustly.

The second stanza introduces the the limitations set upon the caged bird and how this affects thew bird as the bird is still proud and cries for freedom. The caged bird is imprisoned. Nothing is in the bird's control including its wings which are clipped and its feet which are tied making the bird an angry creature. How the poet expresses the Changed bird or African Americans are treated. They are faced with anger, frustration all because of the colour of their skin. 

The third stanza emphasizes the caged bird plight. it tells of how the caged bird sings for freedom, as if it still has hope for things it does not know of. The caged bird fears al the unknown but which the see the unknown if it means getting out of the cage. The bird is shown to rebel against all that held it back in an attempt to be free. The poet-speaker shows how the African Americans speak out for freedom even if the unknown would happen. 

The Fourth stanza is about the free bird again, and how the bird although free thinks of another breeze. This shows that the bird even though it is free is not contented and is greedy to have more freedom. The poet describes how things come easily to the free bird as there are fat worms waiting for it in the dawn on the lawn. The breeze and fat worms are metaphors for all hopes and opportunities that the whites had that the blacks didn't have. 

The fifth stanza shows how the caged bird or African Americans think they will never be free and starting to give up on dreams. But they still have some hopes and begin to sing for freedom. The poet depicts the bird in its cage, the cage that has now become the grave bird's dreams. The caged bird lives in a setting of horror and in the most fearful part.

The Sixth and final stanza is the third stanza repeated for more emphasis representing the caged bird singing out of fear but still in want of the unknown. 

Themes

Racism and Segregation

During an era of white supremacy, the lives of African –Americans were characterized by discrimination and limited opportunities. Blacks were forced to be servile and submissive due to these customs that deeply ingrained in a prejudiced society. The only way for African American to earn respect was for them to have a voice and stand up for their rights. Maya Angelou encouraged those of her ethnicity to do this in her poem “Caged Bird”. The poem expresses a serious contempt against racial discrimination. The blacks are confronted by serious and inhuman incidents of racism, such as lack of regards and lack of freedom. The poem also demonstrates the dogged nature of the black community’s hope for freedom and right to life.  

Self-awareness:

The theme of self-awareness is shown in the poem “Caged Bird” in that the poet highlights how this bird has a rage within herself. This rage is because the caged bird senses it is given the liberty to express itself as other birds and other living creatures do. The bird ‘…stalks down his narrow cage’ (line 8-9). This shows that the bird realized the retractions placed on it in its unnatural environment. To this caged bird, the bars of the cage are ‘bars of rage’ as a result, the bird made concerted effort to sing. Self- awareness here is shown by the fact that the bird longs for something that is unknown. It desires this unknown that is out there because it senses that the unknown is better than being caged. And in essence, a slave to its man-made environment where it cannot spread its wings and fly higher.

Despair and Hope

The caged bird is in a state of despair. Being tied up in the cage compromises his movement. He is hopeful that it will transform into a free bird.

That is why he sings of the anticipated freedom. Freedom seems out of reach, and his "tune is heard" in the distant hill. This tells us that the bird is hopeful one day he will fly over to the distant hill just like his voice.

Fear and Courage

While the free bird finds it easy to fly and enjoy his freedom by claiming the sky, the caged bird lives in fear.

However, he is courageous enough to keep singing and use the power of his throat to fight for his freedom.

Quest for freedom:

The predominant theme of the poem is freedom. The first line depicts this by introducing "the free bird." And the opposite theme is "slavery." A caged bird in captivity "sings of freedom." The caged bird was created for freedom as a free bird

Nonetheless, it is in an unnatural situation, trapped in a cage. Not only is it trapped, but its body has been mutilated as well.

The poem shows how the white race has the audacity to own and govern society unjustly. The speaker concludes’ “(the free bird) dares to claim the sky”. This shows how whites demonstrated discrimination and prejudice toward blacks. The poet describes the action of the caged bird, or African Americans as those that are questing for freedom. They were mistreated because they were different and thought to be inferior. The poet affirms that “His wings are clipped and his feet are tied so he opens his throat to sing”. This highlights the disadvantages African-Americans had to endure due to the colour of their skin. In the end, African-Americans knew it was necessary to stand for their long-deserved freedom.banner

Moral Question:

“Caged Bird” is not just talking about the literally caged birds but the oppression of the Black folks by their white counterparts. In expressing this, the poet is questioning the morality of keeping pets locked up in a cage; the poet shows clearly that there is no moral justification to segregate against fellow humans just because of their colour.

Adversity and good fortune

Sometimes it takes hardship to find out your abilities and strengths, like the caged bird. Sometimes you enjoy the good fortune of using all your abilities, like the free bird.

The caged bird uses his voice to the fullest to help him through hard time, but the free bird has time to enjoy himself with his free body. This can also explain the theme of power and powerlessness.

Poetic devices

Language/Diction:  The words that are used alternate between very harsh, strong words such as “stalks” and “fearful trill” when in a stanza concerning the caged bird, to more flowing words such as “floats” and “sighing tree” when concerned with the free bird.

Imagery: Angelou has vivid imageries. ‘orange sun’, ‘distant hills’, ‘fat worms, etc are examples of visual imageries while ‘sighing trees’, ‘nightmare scream’ and ‘fearful trill’ are auditory imageries

Tone: when talking about the caged bird, the tone and attitude becomes gloomy and depressing showing true emotions of the caged bird. When the poet describes the free bird, the tone is more of optimistic, happy and joyful. The tone surrounding the free bird is soft and also indicative of authority  

Alliteration: Alliteration is used in places like: can seldom see through ‘s’ alliterate, fat worms waiting on a dawn ‘w’ alliterate, bright lawn his shadow shouts on a nightmare scare

Rhyme: the rhyming in the stanzas create a rhythm, a beat for the poem, and the rhythm, gives a more ominous air to the stanzas. End rhyme is used in the second, fourth and sixth lines of the third stanza

Personification: the poet has personified the two birds when she says ‘dips his wings’, ‘dares to claim the sky’, ‘sings of freedom’ etc

Repetition The Poet has repeated the third stanza later in the poem to emphasize the distressed condition of the downtrodden people.


Metaphor: The poem is full of metaphors such as ‘free bird’ and ‘caged bird’. The free bird represents the privileged section of the society whereas the caged one signifies the underpriviledged

Structure

The poet positioned the stanzas based on emotions, themes, and mechanical patterns. The poem has 6 stanzas and 38 lines. The first and fourth stanzas have a happy tone and the rest are morose.

The poet grouped stanzas with similar patterns in the following pairs: Stanza 1 and 2 (7 lines), Stanza 3 and 6(8 lines), Stanza 4 and 5(4 lines).

It's quite interesting how this adds musicality to the poem and creates a rhythm. The poem reads like music. It's like a song with a chorus and a bridge.

Hence, "Caged Bird" can qualify as a lyrical poem.

"Caged Bird" is a free verse poem with some iambic metrical pattern. Iambs are two syllables whereby an unstressed syllable is followed by a stressed syllable. If you read aloud you will realize the rising intonation from the unstressed to the stressed syllable.

Irony

The most striking irony in Maya Angelou’s poem is this. Freedom is denied one segment of the population of a country that prides itself on the ideals of equal rights, individual freedom and liberty. This is clearly an indictment on a nation that preaches freedom to the rest of the world.

Contrast

The persona in I Know Why the Caged Bird Sings contrasts the carefree, privileged life of the whites to the restrictions placed on blacks in the American society.

Much of the poem Caged Bird’s diction and imagery revolves around the differences in the conditions of these two segments of the society.

The most important words that convey the state of racial inequality in the American society are FREE and CAGED.

The structure of the poem is also built around the poetic device known as contrast.

We can observe that while the first stanza speaks of the fruits of freedom freely available to the whites, the second and third stanzas turn to the opposite direction. These two stanzas speak to the sorry condition of the black race in the same society.

This movement between the two opposite conditions in America continues up to the end of the poem.

Thus, the poet has used the poetic device of contrast to expose and also criticize racial discrimination in her native land.

To Maya Angelou, the perpetration of racial injustice is a blot on the conscience of a nation that was founded on the principle of equality for all.